Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 53 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 53 Next Page
Page Background

KUWAIT ENERGY PLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 31 December 2017

42

23.

CONVERTIBLE LOANS (CONTINUED)

The loans carry a coupon interest of 8%-10.5%, and if there is no conversion, the outstanding loans, without additional

interest, are repaid in cash as per the repayment schedule. Should a conversion option be exercised, the outstanding

loans and an additional interest uplift will be converted into equity shares of the Company based on the fair value of

the shares on the conversion date. The additional interest uplift is 5.5%-8% if conversion is within 36 months of the

first draw down and 9.5%-10% if conversion is after this time.

These options are considered to be embedded derivatives which have been determined not to be closely related to the

loan arrangements. The Group has opted to recognise the convertible loans as financial liabilities at fair value through

the income statement based on the Group’s best estimate at the consolidated balance sheet date of relevant likelihood

of the occurrence of each conversion or prepayment option. The fair value, therefore represents the Group’s best

estimate of the discounted future cash flows payable for these loans. The change in fair value in each period arises as

a result of changes in the forecasted cash flows and the likelihood of the occurrence of each conversion or prepayment

option.

The convertible loans are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy in all the years presented. Level 3 fair value

measurements are those derived from inputs that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). The

Group uses a discounted cash flow technique to determine the fair value of the loans. The significant inputs considered

in the valuation are likelihood and timing of a conversion event and the discount rate. The discount rate used was in

the range of 10-18% (2016: 10-18%). Possible changes to the likelihood and timing assumptions in the fair value

measurement could have a maximum impact of reducing the liability by US$ 28.5 million.

24.

OBLIGATIONS UNDER FINANCE LEASES

2017

2016

US$ 000’s

US$ 000’s

Minimum lease payments

Amounts payable under finance leases

Within one year

1,192

1,192

In the second to fifth years inclusive

2,086

3,277

3,278

4,469

Less: future finance charges

(195)

(363)

Present value of lease obligation

3,083

4,106

Present value of minimum lease

payments

Amounts payable under finance leases

Within one year

1,169

1,169

In the second to fifth years inclusive

1,914

2,937

Present value of lease obligation

3,083

4,106

In 2015, the Group sold its office building in Egypt, and leased back the sold building under a finance lease for a total

lease value of US$ 8.2 million which was settled by a US$ 1.5 million down payment and the remaining lease payments

to be paid over a lease term of five years. The Group has the right to buy the leased building at the end of lease period

for an agreed nominal sale price of US$ 1 only. The Group’s obligations under finance leases are secured by the lessor’s

rights over the leased asset. The lease is on a fixed repayment basis and no arrangements have been entered into for

contingent rental payments.

The fair value of the Group’s lease obligation is approximately equal to the carrying value.